<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick and dirty icons in ActionView</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jcoglan.com/2008/03/25/quick-and-dirty-icons-in-actionview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jcoglan.com/2008/03/25/quick-and-dirty-icons-in-actionview/</link>
	<description>This dirt was a building before</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel</title>
		<link>http://blog.jcoglan.com/2008/03/25/quick-and-dirty-icons-in-actionview/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jcoglan.com/2008/03/25/quick-and-dirty-icons-in-actionview/#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>This is what makes Ruby so inspiring to use.

But...

In this example, I think a  method would be better. By doing this, you can avoid the hackish-ness of your approach.

Or?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what makes Ruby so inspiring to use.</p>
<p>But&#8230;</p>
<p>In this example, I think a  method would be better. By doing this, you can avoid the hackish-ness of your approach.</p>
<p>Or?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
